Gulfstream

Entry Posted November 17, 2004

http://www.techcentralstation.com/111504A.html A mostly sensible review of Wikipedia, from a former Editor in Chief of the Britannica. 01:03

What others say about this link

1ec5 (1ec5.livejournal.com):
… user added to Wikipedia. The article has since been rewritten for accuracy, but his piece prompted every newspaper and its dog to publish scathing articles about the project they once exalted as a revolution and a life-saver. Robert McHenry, ofpublic restroom fame …

1ec5 (1ec5.livejournal.com):
… user added to Wikipedia. The article has since been rewritten for accuracy, but his piece prompted every newspaper and its dog to publish scathing articles about the project they once exalted as a revolution and a life-saver. Robert McHenry, ofpublic restroom fame …

Social Media and the Digital Disruption (mppr850.wordpress.com):
… s very hard to know what exactly you can and can’t trust on Wikipedia. Newsman John Seigenthaler got very burned by a libelous write-up, and not surprisingly Encyclopedia Britannica thinks the project is thedevil incarnate. On the other hand, a Nature study found that the two are about equal in accuracy. Of course, the beauty/challenge of Wikipedia is that anyone can edit it, as Colbert likes to demonstrate by raising the subject of …

Librarians as Knowledge Managers (kmlisc.blogspot.com):
… expertise in or even familiarity with the topic, can submit an article and it will be published. 2. Anyone, irrespective of expertise in or even familiarity with the topic, can edit that article, and the modifications will stand until further modified.Then comes the crucial and entirely faith-based step:3. Some unspecified quasi-Darwinian process will assure that those writings and editings by contributors of greatest expertise will survive; articles will eventually reach a steady state that corresponds to the highest degree of accuracy." see also: …

phingblog (phingblog.blogspot.com):
… McCarthy, Caroline. "Colbert Speaks, America Follows: All Hail Wikiality!" Tech News 1 Aug. 2006. 4 Nov. 2007 <http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-6100754-7.html>. McHenry, Robert. "The Faith-Based Encyclopedia." TCS Daily 15 Nov. 2004. 14 Oct. 2007 <www.techcentralstation.com/111504A.html>. Waters, Neil L. "Why You Can't Cite Wikipedia in My Class." Communications of the ACM 50.9 (2007): 15-17. Business Source Complete. EBSCO. Grand Valley State University. 16 Oct. 2007. "The wiki principle." …

Media, Politics, & Truth (jchakerian.wordpress.com):
… Free Online Encyclopedia” is sooo misleading, and is a far stretch from all the funky, and frankly, more accurate “social experiment” descriptions Jimmy Wales first used to describe Wikipedia.  I don’t blame theBritanica guy for getting ticked. Their experts did all this real work and now people are probably plagiarizing their encyclopedia entries like crazy and posting them on Wikipedia as their own. Crowd control is tough. One major advantage Wikipedia has, in addition …

The Article King (www.thearticleking.com):
… Why Does Windows Still Suck? / Why do PC users put up with so many … Columnist asks why PC users put up with so many viruses and worms after his companion got a DSL connection and … Article:Why Does Windows Still Suck? / Why …TCS Daily : Technology - Commerce - SocietyThe former Editor in Chief of the Encyclopfdia Britannica says ‘contribute to Wikipedia if you … I chose a single article, the biography of Alexander … Using Wikipedia to Extend Digital Collections …

The Kool Aid Report -- Home of the MilF! (koolaidreport.blogspot.com):
… restroom. It may be obviously dirty, so that he knows to exercise great care, or it may seem fairly clean, so that he may be lulled into a false sense of security. What he certainly does not know is who has used the facilities before him." -Robert McHenry, Former Editor in Chief of the Encyclopædia Britannica Curious. Developing... Read my blog! …

Boris Veldhuijzen van Zanten (bomega.com):
… Still, the discussion regarding the quality of the information offered is far from over as far as I’m concerned. I recently read Everything is Miscellaneous by David Weinberger which is an incredibily inspiring book. In his book Weinberger quotes (original article) Robert McHenry who is a former Editor in Chief of the Encyclopedia Britannica: The user who visits Wikipedia to learn about some subject, to confirm some matter of fact, is rather in the position of a visitor to a public restroom. It may be obviously …

Reflections (andrewonyango.blogspot.com):
… I recently wrote an article on Wikipedia but if you haven't read it, disregard it because y'all need to read this:http://www.techcentralstation.com/111504A.htmlI just finished reading it and decided that others have too as well. It's funny, far better written and researched than mine, and is very poignant. Also mentions poor modern education which I …

Planet GNOME (planet.gnome.org):
… When people criticise Wikipedia, they often cite specific errors in articles as evidence that its overall quality is poor. The irony in this is that it encourages Wikipedians to fix those exact errors. For instance, in his essay “The Faith-Based Encyclopedia”, Robert McHenry ― one of Wikipedia's most ardent critics ― pointed out ambiguities in the article on Alexander Hamilton: While the day and month of Hamilton's birth are known, there is some uncertainty as to the year, whether it be 1755 or …

(Links provided by Technorati.)