Gulfstream

Entry Posted March 19, 2006

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/19/arts/design/19phot.html Right to take photographs in public spaces trumps right to privacy. (And right to practise one’s religion, sort of.) But: only if the photographs are considered art, and you might have to prove it. 12:10

Delicious tags:

What others say about this link

juud2wordpress - photography (judithdenhollander.wordpress.com):
… There are many similar frictions, questions and cases about the rights of the portraited individual and the rights of the photographer/artist. Here’s an article on the topic : Herald Tribune | Street photography: A right or invasion? / (The Theater of the Street, the Subject of the Photograph) “The practice of street photography has a long tradition in the United States, with documentary and artistic strains, in big cities and small towns. Photographers usually must obtain permission to photograph on private property - including …

juud2wordpress - photography (judithdenhollander.wordpress.com):
… Of course in other countries there are and have similar cases and questions about portrait right, street photography and works of art. Here’s an article on the topic : Herald Tribune | Street photography: A right or invasion? / (The Theater of the Street, the Subject of the Photograph) “The practice of street photography has a long tradition in the United States, with documentary and artistic strains, in big cities and small towns. Photographers usually must obtain permission to photograph on private property - including …

Snapshot.fi (www.snapshot.fi):
… 6. Tekstit - Texts Bruce Gilden Cameraphone Carl De Keyzer Challenges of sp Class Time with Garry W David GibsonDiCorcia in courtDiCorcia judge: Art=free Elliot Erwitt Field camera streetwork Gatufoto Gilles Peress HCB loved India HCB quotes HCB story in Vanity Fair HCB, Decisive Moment JPG Magazine - Street Luvatonta kuvaamista …

APhotoADay News (www.aphotoaday.org):
… Philip-Lorca diCorcia, who unknowingly took his photo then displayed it in a gallery show. The state's highest court ruled yesterday that a Hasidic Jew who had his photo taken without his knowledge could not claim his civil rights were violated -even though his religion forbids it …

(Links provided by Technorati.)