Entry Posted February 12, 2009

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/jamessurowiecki/2009/
02/obama-and-proba.html
James Surowiecki: “Decisionmakers ... should try to come up with their best estimates of how likely a policy is to succeed, as well as its potential payoff, and then pursue the policy with the greatest expected value.” This is not a good idea! If this were followed, no one would ever buy insurance, since the expected value of any sort of insurance purchase is less than zero. (By and large, insurance companies make money, meaning that policy holders lose money.) Pursuing a “highest expected value” policy would mean bets on, amongst other things, extremely unlikely events with huge payoffs. 00:11

What others say about this link

Loren Steffy (blogs.chron.com):
… Wife Withdrew Millions Before Madoff’s Arrest Geithner Crazy Like A Fox? -- maybe it's all an act to make bank nationalization more palpable More Employers Fight Unemployment Benefits Ethanol, Once a Savior, Is StrugglingObama and Probability-- what are the chances the bailout will work? GM's Hummer Brand Is Said to Attract Chinese Company, Private-Equity Firm Bad news from the pasta-industrial complex -- noodling the economic ramifications of higher sales …

(Links provided by Technorati.)